Religious upbringing can make kids less generous



Religious upbringing can make kids less generous

Belying common perception, a new study has found that children from religious families are less likely to share their possessions with others than children from non-religious families.Religious upbringing is also associated with more punitive tendencies in response to anti-social behaviour, the findings showed.
"Our findings contradict the common-sense and popular assumption that children from religious households are more altruistic and kind toward others," said lead researcher Jean Decety, professor at the University of Chicago in the US."In our study, kids from atheist and non-religious families were, in fact, more generous,” Decety noted.

The study included 1,170 children between ages five and 12, from six countries - Canada, China, Jordan, South Africa, Turkey and the US.For the altruism task, children participated in a version of the "Dictator Game," in which they were given 10 stickers and provided an opportunity to share them with another unseen child.Altruism was measured by the average number of stickers shared.For the moral sensitivity task, children watched short animations in which one character pushes or bumps another, either accidentally or purposefully. 

After seeing each situation, children were asked about how mean the behaviour was and the amount of punishment the character deserved.Parents completed questionnaires about their religious beliefs and practices and perceptions of their children's empathy and sensitivity to justice. From the questionnaires, three large groupings were established: Christian, Muslim and not religious. The researchers found that children from households identifying as Christian and Muslim were significantly less likely than children from non-religious households to share their stickers. 

The negative relation between religiosity and altruism grew stronger with age; children with a longer experience of religion in the household were the least likely to share.Children from religious households favoured stronger punishments for anti-social behaviour and judged such behaviour more harshly than non-religious children."Together, these results reveal the similarity across countries in how religion negatively influences children's altruism," Decety said.The study appeared in the journal Current Biology

Morality is often associated with religion, but new research reveals that children from religious households are actually less generous than kids from a secular background.

This conclusion comes from a study of over 1000 children from around the world, published in the journal Current Biology. The project was led by Professor Jean Decety, a neuroscientist from the University of Chicago, who didn’t originally aim to compare moral behavior. “I was more interested in whether I would find differences in empathy or sharing depending on the culture,” he says.

While previous research has examined generosity in adults, Decety’s work shows that upbringing shapes morality early in life. This includes altruism – actions that benefit a recipient at a cost to the donor. Children learn religious values and beliefs from their family and community, through rituals like going to church. If religion promotes morality, kids from religious households should have stronger altruistic tendencies.


Generosity and punishment

Decety’s team of psychologists assessed altruism using ‘the dictator game’: each child was given 30 stickers and told to choose how many to share with an anonymous child from the same school and similar ethnic group. This task reflects choices in ecology – allocating limited resources – and the results were used to calculate a ‘generosity score’. The researchers looked at 1170 children aged 5-12 years old, from six countries (USA, Canada, China, Jordan, Turkey and South Africa). Most kids came from households that identified as Christian (24%), Muslim (43%) or not religious (28%). (Small numbers from Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu and agnostic homes weren’t compared.)

The results revealed that secular children shared more stickers. Muslim children appear to be less generous than Christian kids, but this is not statistically significant (labelled ‘ns’ in the bar chart below). All three groups became less altruistic with age, though religious kids had lower generosity, suggesting that longer exposure to religion leads to less altruism.


The psychologists also assessed views on justice through a moral sensitivity task: after children were shown videos of mild interpersonal harm – such as pushing or bumping – they were asked for a judgment of meanness and a rating for the level of punishment the perpetrator deserved.

Compared to the other two groups, Muslims thought harmful actions were meaner and believed in harsher punishment. Christians judged the harm to be meaner than secular kids, though there was no difference in their punitive ratings. This is consistent with fundamentalism, when actions are seen as either right or wrong, with no gradient in morality between two extremes. Overall, religious children are less tolerant of harmful actions and favored harsh penalties.

Parents were also asked to score their children according to a sense of empathy and sensitivity to injustice. This subjective self-reporting showed that religious adults think their children have strong moral tendencies, contradicting objective assessments of altruism (generosity and moral sensitivity).

Why are religious people less moral? One factor is a psychological phenomenon known as ‘moral licensing’: a person will justify doing something bad or immoral – like being racist – because they’ve already done something ‘good’, such as praying. “It’s an unconscious bias,” Decety explains. “They don’t even see that’s not compatible with what they’ve been learning in church.”

Attitudes and assumptions

History backs-up the scientific evidence that secular people are more moral, as reviewed by Israeli psychologist Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi. Most white supporters of the US Civil Rights Movement were non-religious, for example, while the apartheid regime in South Africa was led by devout Christians and opposed by atheists.

But the view that non-religious individuals are morally dubious is deeply embedded in American society. Atheists and agnostics are considered less trustworthy, even immoral, which explains why people who don’t believe in God are unlikely to be elected to high political office, such as President of the United States.

“If you look at the campaign in the US, everyone who wants to go on TV and talk about being a candidate – from Hilary Clinton to Donald Trump – has to say that they love the Bible,” says Decety. “They have to say that to make sure that people will vote for them, which is not the case in Europe.”

It’s sometimes claimed that secular families are dysfunctional and rudderless because they lack the security of religion. But sociologist Vern Bengston, who has run California’s Longitudinal Study of Generations since 1971, says this isn’t true: “Many nonreligious parents were more coherent and passionate about their ethical principles than some of the ‘religious’ parents … The vast majority appeared to live goal-filled lives characterised by moral direction and sense of life having a purpose.”

So we learn good moral behavior from family life and education, not religious teachings. This raises another question: Why does morality exist in the first place?


********* 

Now, enjoy short song clips in Facebook News Feed

Social media giant Facebook has just started rolling out a new music feature that will let you sample the music shared into your feed.A new post format called "Music Stories" will let users preview 30-second clips of songs shared to Facebook from Spotify, Apple Music, and iTunes, The Verge reported.Music Stories - only available for Facebook's iOS app users as of now - pulls in streams shared to Facebook from Spotify and Apple Music and repackages them in Facebook's new audio player, allowing users to sample the songs and albums without having to leave the app.What's interesting is that you do not need to have Apple Music or Spotify installed on your phone, neither you have to be a subscriber to these services to hear clips on Facebook.If you like the preview, you can save the song to your music collections, or buy it from iTunes by clicking a button on the post.The social network has already begun rolling out the feature to iOS users around the world. 

******** 

30 IS militants killed in Afghanistan 

At least 30 militants loyal to the Islamic State (IS) were killed in eastern Nangarhar province of Afghanistan, a local official said on Friday.The government launched operations against IS fighters in parts of Achin district Thursday night and killed at least 30 insurgents so far, Xinhua quoted district governor Hajji Mohammad Ghalib as saying.However, he did not say if there were casualties among security personnel.IS has been challenging the security forces in parts of Nangarhar province over the past couple of months 

****** 

Boxing more dangerous than mixed martial arts 

Boxing poses a greater risk of serious injury than mixed martial arts that has a reputation for being one of the most brutal and bloody of all contact sports, claims a new study."Yes, you are more likely to get injured if you are participating in mixed martial arts, but the injury severity is less overall than in boxing," explained lead study author Shelby Karpman, sports medicine physician at Glen Sather Sports Medicine Clinic, University of Alberta in Canada. "Most of the blood you see in mixed martial arts is from bloody noses or facial cuts; it doesn't tend to be as severe but looks a lot worse than it actually is," Karpman noted.The researchers reviewed a decade's worth of data from medical examinations following mixed martial arts and boxing matches and found that mixed martial arts (MMA) fighters face a slightly higher risk of minor injuries. Boxers, however, are more likely to experience serious harm from concussions and other head trauma, loss of consciousness, eye injuries, smashed noses and broken bones.The study involved review of post-fight records from 1,181 MMA fighters and 550 boxers who fought matches in Edmonton between 2003 and 2013.The researchers found that 59.4 percent of MMA fighters suffered some form of injury in their bouts -- significantly higher than the injury rate of 49.8 percent for boxers. Most of these injuries were bruises and contusions. But boxers were more likely to experience loss of consciousness during the bout (7.1 percent compared with 4.2 percent for MMA fighters) or serious eye injuries.Boxers were also significantly more likely to receive medical suspensions due to injuries suffered during bouts.The research was published in the Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine.

****** 

Sex safe for most heart patients: Study

Dispelling a common myth, researchers have found that engaging in sexual activity could be safe for most heart patients.Both heart patients and partners may have misconceptions about the perceived dangers of sexual activities and commonly restrict their activities. "Our extensive literature review enabled us to dismiss several myths regarding the advisability of sexual activity in heart patients," said lead author Ricardo Stein from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. "Overall, the risk of death during sex is very low for most clinically stable heart patients, and interestingly, even much lower for the women," Stein noted.Counseling regarding how to gradually resume habitual sexual activity is critical for patients who have experienced a cardiac event or undergone a cardiac procedure, the researchers said.Sexual activity, particularly coitus, is a major aspect of health-related quality of life and is often considered the most pleasant and rewarding form of exercise performed. The study pointed out that sexual activity is typically well-tolerated by most clinically stable heart patients, who are advised to participate in exercise programmes as part of their recovery plan. Occurrence of sudden cardiac death is very rare, corresponding to less than two of all exercise-related deaths, the findings showed.The study equated various sexual activities with walking at different speeds, noting for example that orgasm is equivalent to a brisk walk across a street.The researchers recommended that healthcare providers should offer professional sexual activity advice to heart patients to improve their quality of life.The study was published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 

Religious upbringing can make kids less generous Religious upbringing can make kids less generous Reviewed by Ajit Kumar on 7:46 PM Rating: 5

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.